Tapcensus

Chlorine (MRDL) in drinking water

EPA code 0999Treatment Technique

4,173 active public water systems in 41 states had a Chlorine (MRDL) violation in the past three years, and 432 had one in the latest quarter of EPA's data.

You are on Tapcensus, an independent guide to the EPA compliance records of every public water system in the United States. This page explains Chlorine (MRDL) and lists the water systems whose records include a related violation. It does not show measured levels.

Systems with violations, 3 yr 4,173 3% of active systems
In violation, latest quarter 432 EPA data updated Oct 7, 2026
States affected 41 of 50
EPA limit MRDL: 4.0 mg/L as an annual average

Is Chlorine (MRDL) in the records for your water system?

Enter a ZIP code, town, or street address to see the water systems that serve your area, their status, and which rules and contaminants appear in their violations.

What it is and where it comes from

This entry tracks violations of the Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL) for chlorine — meaning too much disinfectant residual in the distribution system, not too little. Chlorine is added to water to kill pathogens, but excess residual can react with organic matter to form disinfection byproducts.

Health effects

Acute high-dose exposure to chlorinated water can cause eye and nose irritation, stomach discomfort, and nausea. Chronic exposure above the MRDL is primarily a concern because elevated chlorine accelerates formation of trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids, which are associated with increased cancer risk over time.

The standard and what a violation means

EPA limit: MRDL: 4.0 mg/L as an annual average.

Water systems with a Chlorine (MRDL) violation, by state

Active public water systems that reported at least one related violation to EPA in the past three years. Each state links to the list of its affected systems.

StateSystems with violations, 3 yrShare of active systemsIn violation, latest quarter
Texas97113%0
Pennsylvania4296%66
Oklahoma29323%36
Arizona27516%24
Colorado23010%38
Kansas22624%22
Illinois2034%22
Mississippi17114%0
Alaska15211%56
North Carolina1503%18
West Virginia13518%20
Virginia1184%22
New Jersey1123%18
New Mexico1039%4
Idaho1015%19
Minnesota721%6
California571%12
Michigan510%6
Washington441%7
South Dakota335%5
North Dakota328%5
Tennessee294%4
Arkansas253%0
Connecticut221%6
Wyoming223%0
Nevada173%0
New Hampshire131%6
South Carolina131%1
Montana100%2
New York90%0
Wisconsin90%3
Rhode Island82%0
Massachusetts70%0
Oregon70%3
Vermont71%1
Utah61%0
Louisiana30%0
Nebraska30%0
Iowa20%0
Ohio20%0
District of Columbia17%0

Largest water systems with a Chlorine (MRDL) violation

The ten biggest systems, by people served, whose records include a related violation in the past three years.

SystemServesStatusRules violated, 3 yrUnresolved
Metro Water Services
Nashville · Davidson County
789,969 2 0
City of Garland
Dallas County
248,822 2 0
Trenton Water Works
Ewing Twp, Hamilton Twp, Hopewell Twp.1106- and 2 more · Mercer County
217,000 8 2
Wvawc-Kanawha Valley Dist
Charleston · Kanawha County
209,283 3 0
Avondale City of
Avondale · Maricopa County
96,130 2 0
Epcor San Tan
Johnson Ranch · Pinal County
87,435 3 0
City of Baytown
Harris County
86,004 1 0
GW Santa Cruz Water CO
Maricopa · Pinal County
84,000 7 0
Burlington, City of
Burlington · Alamance County
61,365 2 0
Harrisonburg, City of
Harrisonburg City · County
61,000 1 0
About this data

A system is counted once if any of its violations in the past three years involved Chlorine (MRDL), including monitoring and reporting lapses. Rules violated and status in the systems table are for the whole system, not Chlorine (MRDL) alone. Counts cover active systems in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Source: the U.S. EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online system (ECHO), which publishes the federal Safe Drinking Water Information System. EPA's terms and values are shown as published. The records are from EPA's data refresh of Oct 7, 2026; EPA refreshes this data quarterly, and states report to EPA with a lag of three to six months, so the newest violations may not appear yet.