Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate violations in Minnesota
8 active public water systems in Minnesota had a Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate violation in the past three years, 2 of them in the latest quarter of EPA's data. What Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate is and why it matters.
Systems with a Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate violation
Latest quarter first, then largest first| System | Serves | Status | Rules violated, 3 yr | Unresolved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Bug-O-Nay-Ge-Shig Vocational School County |
180 | 5 | 0 | |
|
Bug-O-Nay-Ge-Shig School Gym County |
170 | 7 | 0 | |
|
Lake Elmo Washington County |
10,978 | 1 | 0 | |
|
Le Center Le Sueur County |
2,544 | 1 | 0 | |
|
Redby/red Lake County |
2,099 | 8 | 2 | |
|
Grand Portage County |
820 | 13 | 3 | |
|
Ponemah County |
371 | 9 | 1 | |
|
Daggett Trucking Becker County |
100 | 1 | 0 |
About this data
A system is counted once if any of its violations in the past three years involved Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate, including monitoring and reporting lapses. Rules violated and status in the table are for the whole system, not Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate alone.
Source: the U.S. EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online system (ECHO), which publishes the federal Safe Drinking Water Information System. EPA's terms and values are shown as published. The Minnesota records are from EPA's data refresh of Oct 7, 2026; EPA refreshes this data quarterly, and states report to EPA with a lag of three to six months, so the newest violations may not appear yet.