Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) violations in Minnesota
11 active public water systems in Minnesota had a Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) violation in the past three years, 2 of them in the latest quarter of EPA's data. What Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) is and why it matters.
Systems with a Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) violation
Latest quarter first, then largest first| System | Serves | Status | Rules violated, 3 yr | Unresolved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sartell Stearns County |
20,300 | 1 | 0 | |
|
Eveleth St. Louis County |
3,770 | 2 | 0 | |
|
Vineland County |
4,220 | 1 | 0 | |
|
Ely St. Louis County |
3,258 | 3 | 0 | |
|
New London Kandiyohi County |
1,319 | 1 | 0 | |
|
Grand Portage County |
820 | 13 | 3 | |
|
Alden Freeborn County |
661 | 3 | 1 | |
|
Laprairie Itasca County |
653 | 1 | 0 | |
|
Vermilion County |
450 | 5 | 1 | |
|
Blomkest Kandiyohi County |
161 | 4 | 2 | |
|
Brook Park Pine County |
133 | 3 | 1 |
About this data
A system is counted once if any of its violations in the past three years involved Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), including monitoring and reporting lapses. Rules violated and status in the table are for the whole system, not Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) alone.
Source: the U.S. EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online system (ECHO), which publishes the federal Safe Drinking Water Information System. EPA's terms and values are shown as published. The Minnesota records are from EPA's data refresh of Oct 7, 2026; EPA refreshes this data quarterly, and states report to EPA with a lag of three to six months, so the newest violations may not appear yet.