Public Notification Rule violations in Alabama
10 active public water systems in Alabama had a Public Notification Rule violation in the past three years, 10 of them in the latest quarter of EPA's data. What Public Notification Rule is and why it matters.
Systems with a Public Notification Rule violation
Latest quarter first, then largest first| System | Serves | Status | Rules violated, 3 yr | Unresolved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Warrior River Water Authority Bessemer · Jefferson County |
38,700 | 3 | 1 | |
|
Belforest Water System Daphne · Baldwin County |
17,268 | 2 | 1 | |
|
Daleville, the Wwsb of the City of Daleville · Dale County |
10,014 | 3 | 2 | |
|
Jackson County Water Authority Scottsboro · Jackson County |
7,968 | 4 | 4 | |
|
Hartford, City of Hartford · Geneva County |
4,140 | 4 | 1 | |
|
Cottonwood, Town of Cottonwood · Houston County |
3,570 | 4 | 2 | |
|
Clio Water Works Clio · Barbour County |
2,832 | 3 | 2 | |
|
Mexia Water System, Inc. Mexia · Monroe County |
2,532 | 2 | 1 | |
|
Glenwood Water Works Glenwood · Crenshaw County |
318 | 5 | 3 | |
|
Coleman Lake Usfs Rec Area Heflin · Cleburne County |
135 | 3 | 1 |
About this data
A system is counted once if any of its violations in the past three years involved Public Notification Rule, including monitoring and reporting lapses. Rules violated and status in the table are for the whole system, not Public Notification Rule alone.
Source: the U.S. EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online system (ECHO), which publishes the federal Safe Drinking Water Information System. EPA's terms and values are shown as published. The Alabama records are from EPA's data refresh of Oct 7, 2026; EPA refreshes this data quarterly, and states report to EPA with a lag of three to six months, so the newest violations may not appear yet.