Tapcensus

Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) violations in Minnesota

13 active public water systems in Minnesota had a Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) violation in the past three years, 13 of them in the latest quarter of EPA's data. What Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) is and why it matters.

Health effects: No direct health risk — this is an administrative transparency obligation. Failure means customers lack information to make informed decisions (e.g., whether to use bottled water for infants when lead is elevated).

Systems with a Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) violation

Latest quarter first, then largest first
SystemServesStatusRules violated, 3 yrUnresolved
Meadowlands
St. Louis County
135 2 1
Stonebridge Estates
Scott County
100 3 0
Clearwater Harbor Property, Incorporated
Stearns County
70 4 0
North Roseland Water Association
Kandiyohi County
60 1 1
Hadley
Murray County
56 1 0
Empire Rentals, LLC
Dakota County
53 4 1
Aaseby Court
Pennington County
50 3 1
Sunrise Mobile Home Park
Olmsted County
50 2 0
Shady Oaks Mobile Home Park
Stearns County
40 3 2
Lake Mary Villas
Douglas County
37 5 1
Webster Street Homes
Le Sueur County
34 3 2
Pioneer Park
Carlton County
25 4 2
Why-Not Park
Aitkin County
25 2 2
About this data

A system is counted once if any of its violations in the past three years involved Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR), including monitoring and reporting lapses. Rules violated and status in the table are for the whole system, not Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) alone.

Source: the U.S. EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online system (ECHO), which publishes the federal Safe Drinking Water Information System. EPA's terms and values are shown as published. The Minnesota records are from EPA's data refresh of Oct 7, 2026; EPA refreshes this data quarterly, and states report to EPA with a lag of three to six months, so the newest violations may not appear yet.