Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule violations in North Carolina
9 active public water systems in North Carolina had a Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule violation in the past three years, 3 of them in the latest quarter of EPA's data. What Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule is and why it matters.
Systems with a Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule violation
Latest quarter first, then largest first| System | Serves | Status | Rules violated, 3 yr | Unresolved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Salisbury-Rowan Salisbury · Rowan County |
46,156 | 1 | 0 | |
|
Orange-Alamance Water System Efland · Orange County |
9,223 | 11 | 1 | |
|
Franklinton, Town of Franklinton · Franklin County |
3,142 | 2 | 1 | |
|
Waynesville, Town of Waynesville · Haywood County |
19,758 | 2 | 0 | |
|
Valdese, Town of Valdese · Burke County |
13,571 | 2 | 0 | |
|
Hamlet Water System Hamlet · Richmond County |
10,635 | 4 | 1 | |
|
Tuckaseigee Water & Sewer Auth Cullowhee · Jackson County |
7,528 | 4 | 0 | |
|
Carthage, Town of Carthage · Moore County |
4,307 | 1 | 0 | |
|
Jefferson, Town of Jefferson · Ashe County |
1,740 | 2 | 0 |
About this data
A system is counted once if any of its violations in the past three years involved Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule, including monitoring and reporting lapses. Rules violated and status in the table are for the whole system, not Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule alone.
Source: the U.S. EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online system (ECHO), which publishes the federal Safe Drinking Water Information System. EPA's terms and values are shown as published. The North Carolina records are from EPA's data refresh of Oct 7, 2026; EPA refreshes this data quarterly, and states report to EPA with a lag of three to six months, so the newest violations may not appear yet.