Tapcensus

Nemo Guest Ranch

Transient non-community system in Nemo, Lawrence County, South Dakota, serving 65 people from ground water. 1 rule violated in the past three years, 1 still unresolved. Privately owned.

People served 65 ground water
Rules violated, past 3 years 1 one rule can carry several violations
Unresolved 1 rules currently in violation, EPA data updated Oct 7, 2026
Quarters with violations 0 of the last 12 quarters

Quarterly compliance history

–Q3
2023
–Q4
2023
–Q1
2024
–Q2
2024
–Q3
2024
–Q4
2024
–Q1
2025
–Q2
2025
–Q3
2025
–Q4
2025
–Q1
2026
–Q2
2026
–Q3
2026
–No violation identified VViolation identified SSerious violator (EPA enforcement priority) UUndetermined Oldest quarter on the left. Quarters 1 to 12 are the twelve most recent official quarters at EPA's last data refresh; the 13th is the quarter in progress at that refresh, which EPA reports as undetermined.

Currently in violation

EPA data updated Oct 7, 2026

Public Notice Rule and Revised PN Rule

Other Violation

4 violations, Feb 2002 to open · Public Notification Rule

EPA rule code 410 · 4 violations recorded, 4 still open

Other Violation: 4 violations, open since Feb 2002. A requirement other than monitoring, reporting, or a contaminant limit, such as public notice or the annual water quality report.

Contaminant on the record: Public Notification Rule.

About this data

Rules violated and the list above come from EPA's SDWIS violation records, one row per violation and contaminant, grouped by the rule each row belongs to. A violation counts when its non-compliance period ended on or after Jul 1, 2023, the start of the thirteen quarters ECHO's three-year figures cover, or is still open; it is unresolved when it was still open at EPA's data refresh on Oct 7, 2026. EPA's rule code 500, "Not Regulated", is left out, as in ECHO's counts. Each rule's violation count is EPA's, and one rule can carry several: a missed monitoring round for a group of contaminants is one violation per contaminant and period. Category names are EPA's violation categories.

ECHO's own summary count of rules violated agrees with this grouping for 98.8% of active systems nationally, and its count of rules being violated for 98.7%; where they differ, the figures here follow the rows listed.

A measured value shown with a rule is the sample result EPA recorded with that violation (SDWIS viol_measure), against the limit EPA recorded on the same row (state_mcl), both in EPA's unit as written; violations without a recorded value, such as missed monitoring, show none. Other measured contaminant levels are not part of this record; each system publishes them in its annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Service area from EPA's Public Water System Service Area Boundaries dataset: location confidence HIGHER. The system's location is the centre of the service area EPA publishes for the system.

Source: the U.S. EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online system (ECHO), which publishes the federal Safe Drinking Water Information System. EPA's terms and values are shown as published. The South Dakota records are from EPA's data refresh of Oct 7, 2026; EPA refreshes this data quarterly, and states report to EPA with a lag of three to six months, so the newest violations may not appear yet.