Tapcensus

Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) violations in Colorado

111 active public water systems in Colorado had a Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) violation in the past three years, 111 of them in the latest quarter of EPA's data. What Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) is and why it matters.

Health effects: No direct health risk — this is an administrative transparency obligation. Failure means customers lack information to make informed decisions (e.g., whether to use bottled water for infants when lead is elevated).

Systems with a Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) violation

Latest quarter first, then largest first
SystemServesStatusRules violated, 3 yrUnresolved
Pitkin Iron HOA
Pitkin County
41 3 1
Van Den Berg MD
La Plata County
41 5 0
Durango Falfa MHC LLC
La Plata County
40 3 0
San Acacio Domestic WA
Costilla County
40 4 2
Chair Mtn Ranch HOA Filing 1
Gunnison County
37 1 1
Pacheco Trailer Park
Rio Grande County
36 13 3
Stucker Mesa Domestic WC
Delta County
36 5 1
Maple Grove WD
Boulder County
35 3 2
Park Place MHP
Mesa County
35 1 0
Fire Mountain Programs
Larimer County
26 2 1
Well on Wheels Water Hauler
La Plata County
25 4 1
About this data

A system is counted once if any of its violations in the past three years involved Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR), including monitoring and reporting lapses. Rules violated and status in the table are for the whole system, not Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) alone.

Source: the U.S. EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online system (ECHO), which publishes the federal Safe Drinking Water Information System. EPA's terms and values are shown as published. The Colorado records are from EPA's data refresh of Oct 7, 2026; EPA refreshes this data quarterly, and states report to EPA with a lag of three to six months, so the newest violations may not appear yet.