Tapcensus

North Star Resort

Transient non-community system in St. Louis County, Minnesota, serving 28 people from surface water. 3 rules violated in the past three years, 1 still unresolved. Privately owned.

People served 28 surface water
Rules violated, past 3 years 3 one rule can carry several violations
Unresolved 1 rules currently in violation, EPA data updated Oct 7, 2026
Quarters with violations 5 of the last 12 quarters

Quarterly compliance history

–Q3
2023
–Q4
2023
–Q1
2024
–Q2
2024
–Q3
2024
–Q4
2024
–Q1
2025
–Q2
2025
VQ3
2025
SQ4
2025
SQ1
2026
VQ2
2026
VQ3
2026
–No violation identified VViolation identified SSerious violator (EPA enforcement priority) UUndetermined Oldest quarter on the left. Quarters 1 to 12 are the twelve most recent official quarters at EPA's last data refresh; the 13th is the quarter in progress at that refresh, which EPA reports as undetermined.

Currently in violation

EPA data updated Oct 7, 2026

Public Notice Rule and Revised PN Rule

Other Violation

2 violations, Dec 2025 to open · Public Notification Rule

EPA rule code 410 · 2 violations recorded, 2 still open

Other Violation: 2 violations, open since Dec 2025. A requirement other than monitoring, reporting, or a contaminant limit, such as public notice or the annual water quality report.

Contaminant on the record: Public Notification Rule.

Also violated in the past three years

Jul to Sep 2023 to Jul to Sep 2026

Revised Total Coliform Rule

Monitoring Violation

2 violations, Jul 2025 to Jun 2026

EPA rule code 111 · 2 violations recorded

Monitoring Violation: 2 violations, Jul 2025 to Jun 2026. The system did not complete required monitoring. This does not show that a contaminant was found.

What the rule requires: The 2013 RTCR (effective 2016) replaced the original TCR. It triggers automatic E. coli testing whenever total coliform is found. A single E. coli-positive sample is an acute MCL violation. It also requires systems exceeding 5% total coliform-positive samples to conduct a formal assessment and correct any deficiencies, helping prevent contamination before it escalates.

About this rule

Surface Water Treatment Rule

Treatment Technique Violation Health-based

2 violations, Aug 2025 to Jun 2026

EPA rule code 121 · 2 violations recorded, 2 health-based

Treatment Technique Violation, health-based: 2 violations, Aug 2025 to Jun 2026. The system did not carry out a required treatment process or corrective action.

What the rule requires: All systems using surface water (rivers, lakes, reservoirs) or groundwater under surface influence (GWUDI) must filter and disinfect. Treatment technique violations mean the system failed to maintain adequate disinfectant residual, exceeded turbidity limits, or lacked required permits. Snowmelt and storm events can raise turbidity and pathogen loads in surface water.

Health effects: Without proper filtration/disinfection: Giardia lamblia (severe diarrhea, cramping), Cryptosporidium (life-threatening for immunocompromised individuals), viruses (hepatitis A, norovirus). Turbidity itself is not a health risk but can shield pathogens from disinfection. Limit: Treatment technique: turbidity ≤0.3 NTU in 95% of monthly samples; detectable disinfectant residual in 95% of distribution samples

About this rule
About this data

Rules violated and the list above come from EPA's SDWIS violation records, one row per violation and contaminant, grouped by the rule each row belongs to. A violation counts when its non-compliance period ended on or after Jul 1, 2023, the start of the thirteen quarters ECHO's three-year figures cover, or is still open; it is unresolved when it was still open at EPA's data refresh on Oct 7, 2026. EPA's rule code 500, "Not Regulated", is left out, as in ECHO's counts. Each rule's violation count is EPA's, and one rule can carry several: a missed monitoring round for a group of contaminants is one violation per contaminant and period. Category names are EPA's violation categories.

ECHO's own summary count of rules violated agrees with this grouping for 98.8% of active systems nationally, and its count of rules being violated for 98.7%; where they differ, the figures here follow the rows listed.

A measured value shown with a rule is the sample result EPA recorded with that violation (SDWIS viol_measure), against the limit EPA recorded on the same row (state_mcl), both in EPA's unit as written; violations without a recorded value, such as missed monitoring, show none. Other measured contaminant levels are not part of this record; each system publishes them in its annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Source: the U.S. EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online system (ECHO), which publishes the federal Safe Drinking Water Information System. EPA's terms and values are shown as published. The Minnesota records are from EPA's data refresh of Oct 7, 2026; EPA refreshes this data quarterly, and states report to EPA with a lag of three to six months, so the newest violations may not appear yet.