Tapcensus

Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) violations in South Dakota

12 active public water systems in South Dakota had a Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) violation in the past three years, 12 of them in the latest quarter of EPA's data. What Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) is and why it matters.

Health effects: No direct health risk — this is an administrative transparency obligation. Failure means customers lack information to make informed decisions (e.g., whether to use bottled water for infants when lead is elevated).

Systems with a Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) violation

Latest quarter first, then largest first
SystemServesStatusRules violated, 3 yrUnresolved
Presho
Presho · Lyman County
472 1 1
Lakeside Estates
Aberdeen, Excelsior · Brown County
460 2 1
Weston Heights Homeowners Associatio
Piedmont, Rapid City · Meade County
412 2 0
Mountain Plains 2 Homeowners Assoc
Spearfish · Lawrence County
268 3 1
Chancellor
Chancellor · Turner County
266 1 1
Pine Hills Park
Black Hawk, Summerset, Wellesley · Meade County
200 4 2
Jobee Acres
Aberdeen · Brown County
108 5 2
Pleasant Valley Estates
Aberdeen · Brown County
105 2 0
Canova
Canova · Miner County
89 3 1
Shamrock Colony
Aberdeen, Carpenter · Clark County
75 2 0
Rock Ridge Court
Rapid City · Custer County
74 5 0
Corona
Corona · Roberts County
69 4 0
About this data

A system is counted once if any of its violations in the past three years involved Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR), including monitoring and reporting lapses. Rules violated and status in the table are for the whole system, not Consumer Confidence Rule (CCR) alone.

Source: the U.S. EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online system (ECHO), which publishes the federal Safe Drinking Water Information System. EPA's terms and values are shown as published. The South Dakota records are from EPA's data refresh of Oct 7, 2026; EPA refreshes this data quarterly, and states report to EPA with a lag of three to six months, so the newest violations may not appear yet.