Public Notification Rule violations in Washington
11 active public water systems in Washington had a Public Notification Rule violation in the past three years, 11 of them in the latest quarter of EPA's data. What Public Notification Rule is and why it matters.
Systems with a Public Notification Rule violation
Latest quarter first, then largest first| System | Serves | Status | Rules violated, 3 yr | Unresolved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lummi Tribal Water District Ferndale · County |
3,699 | 8 | 3 | |
|
Taholah Tahola · County |
1,600 | 4 | 2 | |
|
Lucky Eagle Casino Oakville · County |
1,550 | 5 | 3 | |
|
Two Rivers Resort Wellpinit · County |
480 | 6 | 2 | |
|
Keller Mallott · County |
340 | 10 | 0 | |
|
Parker County |
300 | 4 | 0 | |
|
Fort Simcoe Job Corps Ctr Toppenish · County |
230 | 8 | 1 | |
|
Queets Tahola · County |
200 | 5 | 3 | |
|
Rainbow Beach Resort Coulee Dam · County |
158 | 4 | 2 | |
|
Vosper Place Subdivision County |
68 | 4 | 3 | |
|
Twin Lakes Hud Nespelem · County |
42 | 8 | 1 |
About this data
A system is counted once if any of its violations in the past three years involved Public Notification Rule, including monitoring and reporting lapses. Rules violated and status in the table are for the whole system, not Public Notification Rule alone.
Source: the U.S. EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online system (ECHO), which publishes the federal Safe Drinking Water Information System. EPA's terms and values are shown as published. The Washington records are from EPA's data refresh of Oct 7, 2026; EPA refreshes this data quarterly, and states report to EPA with a lag of three to six months, so the newest violations may not appear yet. Retrieved from ECHO on Oct 11, 2026.